DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

Hot New Stock Offerings – Are They Worth It?
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
December 30, 2005

Mastercard is going public. You’ll finally be able to own shares in it. The question is, should you even want to?

Mastercard is just one of a pile of high-profile initial public offerings (IPOs) coming out in 2006. Other names include J. Crew, Morton’s Steakhouse, Tim Horton’s (mmm…) and various tech and energy names. With big-name IPOs coming out in 2006, should you get excited, and try to get in?

The last really high-profile new offering was Google in 2004. And it sure was a winner… Folks who bought it have already made several times their money.

But looking back over the last 35 years of IPO returns, it turns out Google is the exception to the rule. The truth is, you’re better off not chasing IPOs. Let’s take a look:

Jay Ritter, a professor at my alma mater (The University of Florida), studied the returns on IPOs from 1970 basically to the present. He found that IPOs actually underperform the overall stock market . They underperformed in the first year, the second year, and the third year after their introduction.

The Three Best
Gold Investments Right Now

Simply sign up to receive, DailyWealth, and we'll immediately e-mail you this latest research report...
Absolutely FREE:

In fact, over the five-year period after their introduction, IPOs underperformed the stock market at an annualized rate of -4.1% per year .

The underperformance was consistent across each decade, so it’s not a fluke. (One important point about Ritter’s numbers: they start at the end of the first day’s trading of the stock. Other studies by Ritter show that IPOs usually have a first day “pop” higher, above their initial offering price.)

So now we know that IPOs as a group underperform the overall market over the long run. Is there something profitable we can take from this?

I wondered…

I thought that if we knew which stock market sectors made up the largest portion of the IPOs in a year, then we’d know which sector was most loved by investors. Then we’d know which stock sectors are destined to underperform in the coming years.

I ran out of time for this article to run the numbers going way back. But the numbers I found at www.IPOhome.com support my idea…

In 1999 and 2000, tech stocks made up the lions share of IPOs, making up 66% of IPOs in 1999 and 47% of IPOs in 2000. Toward the end of this time, tech stocks (as measured by the Nasdaq) plunged over 80%, from a high of over 5,000 in March of 1999 to near 1,200 in late 2002.

New offerings in the health care/biotech area dominated the IPO market in 2001. They were THE hot thing. These stocks got crushed too… The Nasdaq Biotech Index (^NBI) peaked in mid-2001 at above 1,000, then crashed down to 400 in 2002.

Since then, the IPO market itself crashed. The number of deals shrank. The amount of money going into IPOs pretty much disappeared. New deals raised $97 billion in 2000. In 2003, the number was just $15 billion. With no wild speculation since 2001, I’m not sure the numbers since then tell us anything.

To sum up this article, don’t get too excited about IPOs. The press just needs something to talk about. The truth is, IPOs are nothing special… and the chances of finding another Google are just too slim. Outside of the first-day “pop,” chances are you’ll do worse than the overall market by buying IPOs, over both the short run and the long run.

You must especially avoid the “hot” IPO sector in the years after that sector is hot, like tech stocks in 1999, or biotechs in 2001. Currently, there is no hot IPO sector to steer clear from… although one thing is certain:

Every IPO in 2006 will be promoted as having Google-like potential, or we’ll at least be reminded of how well Google did. But the lesson of history is that this is simply hype. The truth is that there is no pot of gold in IPOs. So don’t buy into the hype.

Good investing,

Steve

Editor's note: Steve Sjuggerud is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Steve Sjuggerud.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

THE S&P’S BIGGEST WINNERS IN 2005…

Top performing S&P 500 stocks in 2005

Apple Computer, Inc. (AAPL); 128.5%
Valero Energy Corp. (VLO); 128.5%
Express Scripts, Inc. (ESRX); 122.9%
EOG Resources, Inc. (EOG); 108.1%
Burlington Resources Inc. (BR); 98.0%
Sunoco, Inc. (SUN); 94.4%
Humana Inc. (HUM); 85.1%
National-Oilwell Varco Inc. (NOV); 80.5%
Office Depot, Inc. (ODP); 78.8%
Corning Incorporated (GLW); 70.9%

…AND THE S&P’S BIGGEST LOSERS IN 2005

 Worst performing S&P 500 stocks in 2005

Dana Corporation (DCN); -59.7%
Gateway, Inc. (GTW); -58.4%
General Motors (GM); -53.5%
Sanmina-SCI Corporation (SANM); -49.2%
Lexmark International, Inc. (LXK); -46.5%
Ford Motor (F); -46.4%
Unisys Corporation (UIS); -42.8%
Applied Micro Circuits Corporation (AMCC); -38.7%
Mercury Interactive Corp. (MERQE); -37.5%
Avaya Inc. (AV); -37.2%

 


"Spain’s Socialist government on Tuesday officially abolished the siesta, the extended lunch break."

- Financial Times

"As Americans grow heftier, automakers are making seats wider, adding more space to interiors and using bigger virtual mannequins to help design vehicles.

Domestic automakers say they already had seats for increasingly rotund motorists. Now foreign brands are catching up.

Getting bigger:

- Honda: The 2006 Civic offers front seats that are three-quarters of an inch wider than those in the 2005 model. Purpose: "To meet the growing needs of our customers," spokesman Sage Marie says.

Extra-wide seats are important now that 62% of adults are considered overweight or obese, according to market research firm NPD Group. The figure has doubled since the late 1970s."

- USA Today


"A surge in investment in new refineries is under way overseas even as U.S. refiners remain leery of adding facilities – a development that could make the U.S. more reliant on imports of refined products like gasoline and heating oil in coming years.

No refinery has been built in the U.S. since 1976, due to historically low profit margins as well as regulatory barriers and the not-in-my-backyard attitude of communities around the country."

- The Wall Street Journal


"We regret this situation has occurred and realize this may cause concern for our associates and customers."

- Stephen P. Weisz, President
Marriott International Vacation Club, on losing backup computer tapes that contained the social security numbers, credit card numbers, and bank numbers of more than 200,000 people

Advertisement

A DEFENSIVE, HIGH INCOME PLAY

NL Industries (NL) has paid a consistent dividend since 1983.

NL Industries is the majority owner of two large U.S. companies:
CompX, a leading producer of ball bearing slides and office security products, and Kronos Worldwide Inc., the world’s leading producer of titanium oxide pigments (used to color plastics and paint).

This company has an iron clad balance sheet (no debt, plenty of cash) and yields 7%. In addition, NL is one of the few "non-energy" related stocks with a high yield.

Source: The 12% Letter

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202