DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

If It Ain't the Next Depression, It's Time to Buy
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
October 7, 2008

As long as we're not heading into the Next Great Depression... it's time to buy stocks.

That's the message I got from studying 150 years of stock-market data this week...

I can't know the future, of course. But I do know in the last 70 years, the stock market has turned in a worse 12-month performance (if October closes at today's levels) only once. That came toward the end of the horrendous bear market of 1973-74.

But after stocks fell 41% in 12 months... they were up 32% a year later.

It turns out this is the rule, not the exception... When stocks have a terrible 12 months, they typically have a good 12 months after that. Take a look:

Date

Worst 12-month falls

P/E after fall

1 year later

3 years later

May 1970

-26%

14.7

30%

37%

Sep 1974

-41%

8.0

32%

52%

Jul 1982

-18%

7.4

52%

78%

Aug 1988

-21%

14.1

34%

51%

Sep 2001
-28%
25.3
-22%
7%

Oct 2008

-28%

12.4*

?

?

*forward P/E ratio

Looking farther back (150 years), the pattern continues:

Date

12-month fall

P/E after fall

1 year later

3 years later

Jun 1877

-34%

 

25%

75%

Nov 1907

-37%

10.6

41%

49%

Oct 1930

-36%

18.2

-43%

-47%

Jun 1932

-66%

5.6

118%

112%

Mar 1938

-43%

12.4

20%

-3%

The only times you didn't make double-digit positive returns 12 months after a major fall were after the dot-com bust and in the Great Depression.

In those two cases, you were starting from record-high valuations. A big difference today is, stocks are cheap.

So, yes, the stock market has just experienced its second-worst 12-month fall in the last 70 years (again, if it closes this month at today's levels). But generally when this happens, it's time to buy, not time to sell.

(An important note here... All of this data is from the worst 12-month period in a bear market. We may not have seen the worst 12-month period in this bear yet. We can't know.)

The point is, you'd have made solid double-digit returns every time going back 150 years, except twice... after 1929 and after 2000. In both those cases, stocks were so overpriced, they were still expensive even after their 12-month fall. In short, they had farther to fall.

The biggest gains, of course, were made when stocks were the cheapest after a fall. By 1932, stocks were darn cheap, at a P/E of 5.6. Stocks rose 118% in the next 12 months.

More recently, stocks were extremely cheap in 1982 after a big 12-month fall. They were at a P/E of 7.4. Sure enough, they rose 52% in the next 12 months.

Related Articles

Don't Buy the Fear

How to Guarantee Your Bank Deposits Up to $50 Million

So are stocks cheap or expensive now? Stocks are cheaper today than they've been in over 20 years. (The forward P/E of the S&P 500 is about 12.3.)

We're missing the uptrend, so I can't recommend buying just yet. (It could arrive tomorrow... Or it could take years.) But history suggests stocks will be higher by double digits 12 months from now...

Good investing,

Steve

Editor's note: Steve Sjuggerud is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Steve Sjuggerud.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

THIS IS WHY COMMODITY STOCKS ARE DROPPING 60%

When a hedge-fund manager loses a ton of investor capital, it receives a ton of requests to return what's left of that capital to clients. These requests are called "redemptions."

Redemptions are flooding hedge funds right now... and they're proving catastrophic to a trade most funds have loved for a long time. That trade is "long commodities on leverage."

For a picture of this catastrophe, we present the gruesome chart of Suncor Energy. Suncor is at the epicenter of the "long commodity" trade. It's one of the largest players in the Canadian oil sands. When a huge hedge fund wants to get long energy, it often chooses Suncor.

As you can see, Suncor has declined from a peak near $70 per share to around $28 per share... a decline of 60% in just four months. This is an unnatural decline. It's also a sign big hedge funds are going under and facing massive redemption requests... which leads to selling and lower prices... which leads to more redemption requests... which leads to... you get the idea.

Suncor Energy, Inc.

As Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and his global colleagues fight the worst financial crisis since the 1930s, one danger is looming larger by the day: deflation.

With asset markets tumbling, commodity prices plunging the most in 50 years and banks keeping a tighter grip on credit, the ingredients for a sustained period of falling prices are coalescing. While inflation is still a concern for many policy makers only months after oil and food prices peaked, the risk is their patchwork of rescue and stimulus packages will fail, and prices will start to fall throughout the broader economy.

Prices are already falling in parts of the world economy. Home values dropped more than 10 percent in the U.K. and in the U.S. in the past year. Oil, copper and corn drove commodities toward their biggest weekly decline since at least 1956 on Oct. 3, with the Reuters/Jefferies CRB Index of 19 raw materials tumbling 10.4 percent. The Baltic Dry Index, a measure of commodity shipping costs, has dropped 75 percent since May.

"We are certainly more worried about deflation than inflation," says David Owen, chief European economist at Dresdner Kleinwort Group Ltd. in London. Central bankers need to "get rates down and keep them there for quite some time," he says.

– Bloomberg

Corn and soybeans fell the maximum allowed by the Chicago Board of Trade on speculation that a spreading credit crunch will spur a global economic slowdown, cutting demand for food, feed and fuel made from the crops.

"It's all about a lack of global banking liquidity," said Roy Huckabay, executive vice president for the Linn Group in Chicago. "Everything is frozen, even if the drop in prices is beginning to make livestock feeding more attractive."

Corn fell 16 percent last week, the most since at least June 1973, and soybeans fell 15 percent, the biggest weekly decline since June 2004. Corn has declined 47 percent from its June record and soybeans have lost 43 percent from an all-time high in July.

– Bloomberg

The Government's Painkiller Won't Fix This Hangover
October 6, 2008

How AIG's Collapse Began a Global Run on the Banks
October 4, 2008

Don't Buy the Fear
October 3, 2008

The Single Best Income Strategy Ever Created Just Got Better
October 2, 2008

The Best Place to Look for Income Today
October 1, 2008

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202