DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

What You Don't Know About Big
Gold Miners

By Matt Badiali, editor, S&A Prospector
April 3, 2008

Seymour Schulich probably saved Newmont Mining with a single stock trade.

In October 2004, Schulich came to the simple realization that even though prices had already doubled over the preceding two years, oil's cost had to rise much higher since demand continued to outstrip supply.

As the chief of Newmont's investment bank, Schulich knew this was a major problem for his company.

You see, oil prices are a big part of the cost of mining. Huge trucks and machines mostly burn diesel fuel. Even the tires are made of oil. As a gold miner, Newmont would see its earnings suffer from continued oil price hikes.
Faced with the potentially crippling rises in mining costs, Schulich hit on an elegant solution: The perfect hedge against rising oil prices was to own a stake in an oil company.

So Schulich purchased for Newmont 6 million shares of Canadian Oil Sands Trust – a producer with vast reserves of low-quality bitumen. Schulich figured as oil prices rose, oil-sands assets would go from marginal to very profitable. As a result, the shares of bitumen producers, like Canadian Oil Sands Trust, would rise faster than those of companies producing prized (and pricey) light, sweet crude.


Schulich's goal was simple: "I bought this thing to make four times my money in three years."

(Incidentally, Schulich had a little skin in the game, too... He personally bought 3 million shares, separate from Newmont's position.)

Since then, the price of oil has doubled again, rising from about $53 a barrel to more than $107. And Canadian Oil Sands shares behaved exactly as Schulich predicted. While Canadian Oil Sands Trust's share price has "only" risen 171% since then, the shares split 5:1... That's a 384% total gain, counting dividends, in a little more than three years.

Here's why the Canadian Oil Sands investment was critical to Newmont. While the price of oil doubled, Newmont's mining costs rose along with it. The company spent $697 to mine an ounce of gold in 2007, up from $412 in 2004.

Newmont sold its gold last year at $700 an ounce, barely more than breakeven with its mining costs.

Meanwhile, Schulich's investment paid dividends in 2007 worth $8 per ounce of gold Newmont produced. While that doesn't look like much, it turned out to be the difference between producing gold at a profit or at a loss.

That's how bad costs have become lately. And oil isn't the only expense miners have to worry about... Fertilizer, believe it or not, has become a problem recently. Miners use a ton of nitrogen explosives to blast out the mines, but fertilizer costs have gone through the roof with the grain boom.

Steel and concrete, same thing. Two of the industry's biggest projects have seen construction costs escalate 30%-40%. But, as I said, the real issue is diesel...

Miners have to feed a fleet of trucks... everything from the water truck that keeps the dust down at the bottom of the mine to the huge three-story-tall ore haulers.  

So investors have to remember that just because a company is producing gold, it doesn't necessarily mean it will make money.

These companies are exposed to the same high prices that we face at the pump... and the grocery store. Seymour Schulich helped keep Newmont afloat, but he wasn't quite able to overcome cost inflation.


While costs remain sky-high, I gold investors can consider skipping right to bullion or the Gold ETF (GLD) as opposed to buying big mining stocks.

Good investing,

Matt

Editor's note: Matt Badiali is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Matt Badiali.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

THE ULTIMATE BASICS STOCK

The ultimate basics stock is having a terrific 2008.

Our colleague Dan Ferris detailed the war against Wal-Mart in these pages back in 2006. As Dan pointed out, it's hard to find a stock as hated as Wal-Mart. It's also hard to find a better performing big stock right now than "Wally World." Shares have gained 20% in the past three months to reach a three-year high.

Wal-Mart's rally is an odd confirmation of what we've been writing in DailyWealth for the past several years... Companies involved in the basics of civilization – corn, soybeans, soap, clothing, oil, steel, coal, and metals – are outperforming companies involved in making civilization's landfill stuffing (like roller shoes and $100 shirts).

We've mentioned timberland, gold coins, and commodity producers as long-term ways to profit from this "basics" rally. Wal-Mart is the world champion of cheap basics... which is sending its share price higher.


Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

When economic worries rise, many consumers forgo life's little luxuries.

Those luxuries are getting a lot bigger.

March proved another tough month for carmakers, with overall U.S. sales declining 12% compared to the same month last year, reports released Tuesday showed.

While results were bad in nearly all categories, among the larger drags were luxury vehicles, which declined 15%, according to Autodata Corp.

Sales for Toyota Motor Co.'s Lexus division fell 18%, compared with 5.7% for the Toyota and Scion brands. Porsche was down 26%. And even Mercedes, which had a strong February, was down nearly 4%.

Ford Motor Co. saw overall sales slip 14%, but was hardest hit in its high-end Lincoln division, which fell 26% in March, worse than any major brand except Hummer.

– Los Angeles Times

The Discover U.S. Spending Monitor fell to a fresh low in March on increasing concerns over the economy and rising household expenses.

The monthly index fell to 85.1, a full point lower from the previous month and 11 points lower than six months before.

The survey showed a 12 point jump in the number of consumers anticipating higher household expenses next month – 52% from 40% a month earlier. That means less discretionary spending and savings. More than 39% of respondents said they would save or invest less next month, up from 36% in February.
– Wall Street Journal

DailyWealth is Dr. Steve Sjuggerud's FREE daily e-Letter

To receive Steve's best investment ideas each month, try a no-risk trial subscription to his monthly advisory, True Wealth.

Get started now.

A Visit to the Filthiest City in North America
April 2, 2008

How to Turn Flat Stocks into Triple-Digit Winners
April 1, 2008

How to Earn a 240% Annual Interest Rate
March 31, 2008

The Biggest and Boldest Commodity Prediction Made This Week
March 29, 2008

You Would Make 250% Gains... So Why Won't You Do It?
March 28, 2008

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202