DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

Things Aren't Always What They Seem
By Tom Dyson
October 19, 2007

Last month, Ben Bernanke cut interest rates by 50 basis points. Next week, he may cut them again...

What does this mean for our investments? The answer is not as obvious as everyone thinks...

First, when the Fed cuts rates, people assume it'll be good for stocks. After all, lower interest rates reduce borrowing costs for America's companies. And lower borrowing costs mean higher profits.

Second, gold should go up. Gold pays no interest. It competes against other assets that do pay interest. When the Fed cuts interest rates, those assets pay less interest. So gold's "relative yield" looks better.

Third, the dollar's exchange rate should go down. When your neighbor offers a higher interest rate than you do, more money will flow to your neighbor's currency. So when the Fed cuts interest rates, the dollar becomes less attractive versus everyone else's currencies. And it falls...

Simple isn't it? But wait... not so fast... I've got some information for you… and I think you'll find it very surprising...

Two out of three of these "conventional" beliefs are wrong. Let me explain...

Jason Goepfert is a "sentiment" trader. He studies the crowd's sentiment and makes trades based on his findings. For example, if the crowd is very optimistic, Jason will go short. If it's pessimistic, Jason will buy. It's simple contrarianism. Jason publishes his findings at www.sentimentrader.com. It is one of the few sources Steve and I cannot live without.

Last month, Jason published new research on his site. Since 1971, the Fed has started eight rate-cutting campaigns. Jason defines a rate-cutting campaign as a reduction in the Fed's discount rate after a period of raising rate... or a reduction in the Fed's discount rate after going more than a year without changing rates.

Jason looked at each of these rate-cutting campaigns and studied the reactions of gold, the dollar, commodities, and stocks in the year that followed them. Here's what he found:

Average performance of gold, U.S. dollar, stocks, and commodities after the Fed starts a rate cutting campaign...

1-Year Return

Max Gain

Max Loss

DJIA

19%

25%

-6%

US Dollar Index

5%

9%

-3%

Gold

-5%

10%

-16%

CRB Index

-6%

4%

-11%

Conventional wisdom says the dollar falls during Fed rate cutting campaigns. I saw this headline on Bloomberg this morning: "Dollar falls to record low versus euro on speculation Fed will cut rates."

More on Chris Weber

The Makings of the Fashionable Trade of 2008

Investors Have Given Up: Buy Precious Metals

The reality is, except for 1984, the dollar rose every time, while gold fell during six out of eight rate-cutting campaigns. "From the precedents we have," writes Jason, "four themes are clear. Fed easings have been good for stocks, good for the U.S. dollar, bad for gold and bad for commodities."

Yes, all of the headlines say lower interest rates mean a lower dollar… but as history shows, things aren't always what they seem.

Good investing,

Tom

Editor's note: Tom Dyson is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Tom Dyson.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

THE WORLD'S BEST-PERFORMING BIG OIL STOCK

"As the industry begins to accept the new reality of $65-a-barrel oil, all kinds of new areas will open up to exploration. The first beneficiary of this new reality will be the deepwater sector..."

Last week, our colleague Matt Badiali described how "there are no easy barrels left." He recommended owning companies that benefit from the boom in deepwater oil drilling. As today's chart shows, Matt is onto something...

We've sung the praises of Big Oil many times in the past... but none of them deserve it more than Brazilian oil giant Petrobras. Now a $184 billion company, Matt's "buy-recommended" Petrobras is one of the world leaders in offshore oil drilling. It has to be... most of its reserves are just off the Brazilian coast in the giant Campos Basin field.

The past three years in Big Oil stocks have been one big footrace to the upper right corner of the charts. Royal Dutch-Shell is up 79%... Chevron is up 93%... ExxonMobil is up 106%. Petrobras, however, has returned 410% during the same time.

Petrobras

– Brian Hunt

President Vladimir Putin said Russia has "grandiose plans" to continue the country's largest military build-up since the end of the Cold War.

"We have plans, not simply big, but grandiose plans," Putin said today in his annual call-in television program with Russians spread across 11 time zones." And they are completely realizable." Putin was responding to a question from soldiers stationed at a military base in Plesetk, site of a successful launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile earlier today.

Russia, the world's biggest energy supplier, last year earmarked 6 trillion rubles ($240 billion) for military spending through 2015 as Putin uses revenue from high commodity prices to restore the country's might.

– Bloomberg

Security screeners at two of the nation's busiest airports failed to find fake bombs hidden on undercover agents posing as passengers in more than 60% of tests last year, according to a classified report obtained by USA TODAY.

Screeners at Los Angeles International Airport missed about 75% of simulated explosives and bomb parts that Transportation Security Administration testers hid under their clothes or in carry-on bags at checkpoints, the TSA report shows.

A report on covert tests in 2002 found screeners failed to find fake bombs, dynamite and guns 24% of the time. The TSA ran those tests shortly after it took over checkpoint screening from security companies.

Tests earlier in 2002 showed screeners missing 60% of fake bombs. In the late 1990s, tests showed that screeners missed about 40% of fake bombs, according to a separate report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

- USA TODAY

DailyWealth is Dr. Steve Sjuggerud's FREE daily e-Letter...

To receive Steve's best investment ideas each month, try a no-risk trial subscription to his monthly advisory, True Wealth.

Get started now.

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202