DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

How to Become a Millionaire on Just $25,000 a Year
By Dan Ferris
June 16, 2007

There once was a man who became a millionaire... even though he never made more than $25,000 a year in his whole life.

A few years ago, when he was 85, he had about $1.4 million.

I bet there are precious few people who've made $25,000 a year or less and have $1.4 million in the bank, even though it takes far less effort than most people would ever believe.

  • Did this fellow hit the lottery? He did not. I bet he's way too smart to gamble.
  • Did he trade options? Perish the thought. Too complicated.
  • Did he invest in a hedge fund? Again, too complicated – and too damn expensive!
  • Does he at least read Extreme Value? I do not know, but I seriously doubt it.

The man who never made more than $25,000 a year started investing in 1974 with $500. I don't know how much he put away each year, but it couldn't have been very much at all, not on such a modest income.
Advertisement

Perhaps you're thinking, "Oh I get it. You're about to tell me he bought shares of Berkshire Hathaway with a few hundred dollars. That's why he's a millionaire now."

No. In fact, the millionaire who never made more than $25,000 a year did something very nearly the opposite of buying Berkshire Hathaway...

He bought the Vanguard "500 Index Fund and Total Stock Market Index Fund, several of [Vanguard's] managed equity funds and taxable and tax-exempt bond funds, and a diversified list of individual stocks."

The list is quoted from John Bogle's new book, The Little Book of Common Sense Investing. Bogle tells the story of the millionaire who never made more than $25,000 a year on pp. 213-214. Perhaps the most remarkable statement in the letter Bogle received from his faithful client was this: "I have only bought – never sold."

This statement did not shock me, since I firmly believe that no one knows when or how to sell stocks (not even Warren Buffett).

I don't do as much writing as my more prolific (and much wealthier!) colleagues. Aside from a little laziness, I just can't get around my strong belief that there's little that actually needs to be written about investing.

But – and this is a big, fat "but" – what needs to be written about investing needs also to be repeated forever. One thing that bears repeating is that it's unlikely the average investor will beat the market over the long term. Most investors shouldn't even attempt to actively manage their own stock portfolio. They should buy a diversified portfolio of stocks, hold it for the long, long, term and never sell.

Whether or not the market is totally efficient isn't the point. The point is that most individuals aren't emotionally wired up for active investing, any more than they're wired up to play Major League baseball.

The man who made $25,000 a year or less in his 50s, 60s, and 70s knew he wasn't a budding Warren Buffett. So he put his money into a big, diversified portfolio that charged very low fees and left it there forever – by far the most prudent investment he could have made. That's your best chance of getting rich in stocks. Buy a bunch and never sell. By never selling, you keep your money at arm's length from the taxman and allow it to compound year after year.

I've preached focus – the idea of owning just a few high quality stocks – for a few years now, but I have to admit that a highly focused approach is not appropriate for most people. In fact, I'm willing to bet that, of my thousands of readers, the few who can handle a focused portfolio are very likely to be investment professionals with decades of experience.

If you don't feel like you're suited to own individual stocks, just buy a diversified, low-cost index fund and hold it for decades. It's useless advice to the financial services industry – an industry that encourages you to buy lots of worthless mutual funds – but it's the best chance most people have of getting rich in stocks. If you do choose to buy individual stocks, here's my take:

Buying a diversified portfolio (10 stocks is plenty) of the greatest businesses that have ever existed and holding it for a long, long time is your best chance (not to mention the easiest way) to get rich by owning stocks.

Don't get scared out of the market. Don't trade. Don't worry about the headlines or the news or the S&P 500 falling 10%. Just buy a diversified portfolio of great businesses and hold on for at least two decades. That's how you make huge long-term averages of 15% or even 20% a year.

That's how you become a stock-market millionaire, even on a modest income.

Good investing,

Dan

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

40%

According to the U.S. Commerce Department, the percentage of American households who believe they could accumulate $500,000 more easily through the lottery than by savings.

Advertisement

The New Magic Bullet
By Tom Dyson

June 15 , 2007

Experts have discovered a crop that can produce diesel fuel... at the same price as regular diesel fuel. Sounds unbelievable, huh? Just think about that for a moment. This plant is going to revolutionize transportation...

Read On...

Your Editor at David Rockefeller's 92nd Birthday Party
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud

June 14, 2007

If you don't know, David Rockefeller just sold a 1950s Rothko painting for $70 million a few weeks before this trip – a painting he had bought for less than $10,000 in 1960. Now you might think... what's a rich guy going to do with that money?

Read On...

Your Editor Meets the World's Biggest Investor
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
June 13 , 2007

Just as the bidding started, Bill Gross walked in. He sat down in the seat directly behind me, just a couple feet away. We chatted a bit during breaks. And we walked to a small invitation-only lunch together, talking newsletters and Icelandic bonds.

Read On...

'Go Ahead and Low-Ball Me'
By Tom Dyson
June 12, 2007

In my development, where all the houses are the same, owners are scrambling to undercut each other. Then you've got investors like Eric. Their interest payments are rising... they're hemorrhaging more money every month and doing everything they can to unwind their portfolios.

Read On...

The Next Dot-Com Sector
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
June 11 , 2007

I came here interested in bonds, because of their extraordinary profit potential. Many in the group, however, only perked up when the six-foot, blond-haired, blue-eyed Icelandic girl appeared...

Read On...

THE 'INTEL' OF THE COMMODITIES BOOM

3,621%.

That's what you would have made by owning Intel shares throughout the tech boom of the 1990s. The reason for the giant gain is simple: Every network, every piece of software, every cell phone, every laptop was running on an engine fueled by semiconductors, Intel's specialty.

That's why you could call True Wealth holding BHP Billiton the "Intel of the Commodities Boom."

As we've been writing for years, the world is in the midst of a huge, China-driven, bull market in raw materials... and selling China the cement, copper, zinc, oil, uranium, and iron ore it needs to grow is the easiest way to profit. The world's largest diversified commodity producer, BHP fuels the world.

Of course, China will boom and bust along the way... just like any developing nation. But long-term investors can look at it this way: Intel was a "one-decision" investment of the tech boom, BHP Billiton plays the same role in the commodity boom.

- Brian Hunt

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202