DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

Up 28% In Stocks Since July, Where to From Here?
by Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
October 27, 2006

On July 21 of this year, I went out on a limb…

On that day, the Nasdaq was at its lowest point of the year. I told my True Wealth subscribers that it was time to back up the truck and buy stocks. Most of my readers probably thought I was crazy.

Specifically I said: “I believe that, on a reward-to-risk basis, this may be our best True Wealth opportunity of 2006. I suggest you put a good amount into this trade.”

I thought the market was bottoming right then. And I told readers, “I think we could actually make a relatively safe 60% in the next six months.”
Advertisement

So far we’re four months into the trade, and we’re up 28%. (I recommended a simple mutual fund that leverages the returns of a regular stock index)

Why did I recommend subscribers buy stocks on July 21? My reason was simple... I told my readers this: “The common man is more gloomy about stocks right now than he was at any time during the month of the worst crash in our investment lifetimes. [October 1987]”

We simply followed one of the oldest rules on Wall Street. That rule was best defined over a century ago by the legendary investor Daniel Drew: “The way to make money in Wall Street is to calculate on what the common people are going to do, and then go and do just the opposite.”

All we did was follow that classic rule.

How do I size up what the “common man” is doing? One area I look to is the surveys of investor sentiment, like the one put out by the American Association of Individual Investors (www.aaii.com). In July of this year, the percentage of investors with a bearish stock market outlook reached an extreme that was greater than October 1987.

Truth be told, sizing up investor sentiment is difficult... Primarily, I track sentiment through my friend Jason Goepfert’s outstanding service, www.sentimentrader.com.

Jason probably tracks a hundred different sentiment indicators. He calls his headline indicator the “Smart Money/Dumb Money” confidence indicator. Backtesting this indicator to 1995, the S&P 500 was up 433%, with a 20% maximum drawdown, following his indicator. Buy and hold over the same period of time would have earned a 198% return, with a maximum drawdown of 48%.

Jason’s Smart Money/Dumb Money indicator said to buy stocks in May of last year, and it’s been bullish since. It’s been a good trade, as the major stock indexes are up about 20% since then. But times are changing now… The “dumb money” is getting optimistic… so this indicator may switch to bearish soon, after being bullish for the last year and a half.

Trading sentiment is extremely difficult. But it’s worth the effort…

Here at DailyWealth, our investing mantra is: cheap, hated, and in an uptrend. This is because I believe the very best investments come when you can find all three of these things in your favor: value, trend, and sentiment.

The thing is, there’s always someone out there smarter than you, with a faster computer… so it’s very hard to generate outsized returns by simply screening for value and trends. The one thing that’s hard to number crunch is sentiment… It’s feelings, so by definition, it’s hard to quantify. But that’s good…

To me, this means there’s still room to make outsized profits using sentiment as an indicator… Profits like the ones True Wealth subscribers have made in the trade I described above…

The way to make money in Wall Street is to calculate on what the common people are going to do, and then go and do just the opposite.”

Keep Drew’s mantra on hand at all times. It’s how he made a fortune in the mid-1800s. It’s what we did in July 2006, which led to big profits. It’s been a profitable strategy for centuries.

On Monday, I’ll share with you one area of the markets where the common man has given up… so this investment is ripe to rally. Until then,

Good investing,

Steve

P.S. If you’d like to track sentiment yourself, check out Jason Goepfert’s website www.sentimentrader.com. It’s what I use.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

BIG OIL: THE BEST INVESTMENT IN THE WORLD?

Raking in over $10 billion, ExxonMobil just had the second greatest quarter in corporate history. First place isn’t worried much though… ExxonMobil holds the number one greatest quarter as well.

We emailed our resident oil expert, Matt Badiali for his comments on the ExxonMobil blockbuster. His reply: “As I told you months ago… the supermajor oil stocks are wonderful businesses with oil at $40 a barrel. But they’re absolutely incredible businesses when oil is at $60. Now please stop bugging me… I’m researching my next pick.”

Matt’s take on the majors looks to be dead on… As today’s chart displays, the biggest of big oil has moved to a new high after blowing away Wall Street’s estimates.

Another $10 billion quarter and another new high: ExxonMobil

-Brian Hunt


“Democrats have a New Direction for America. We will energize America with farmers fueling our energy independence. We will invest in the Midwest, not the Middle East, to end our dependence on Middle East oil in 10 years – developing American alternatives, including biofuels, and promoting energy efficiency and advanced technologies. 

We will also investigate and punish price gouging, eliminate billions of subsidies for oil and gas companies and use the savings to provide consumer relief.”

-Nancy Pelosi,
House Democratic Leader

“As supply fears and demand have ebbed and the Fed has tightened, [oil] prices have fallen back down, albeit still to higher levels than a decade ago.

The recent price decline is also proof of the folly of a ‘windfall profits’ tax or similar punitive measures against Big Oil favored by so many politicians. Only this week, however, Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi repeated her pledge to soak the oil companies if her party takes over the House next month.

Her policy seems to be that when oil prices decline, oil company shareholders must absorb all the market risk and the lower profits. But when oil prices rise, the companies must hand over a cut of their profits to Members of Congress to spend as they like. The only ‘windfall’ is for the political class.”

-Wall Street Journal

Advertisement

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202