DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

Steve Sjuggerud’s note: I start every day by reading The Gartman Letter. I get two things from it... stories AND insights that I simply don’t find anywhere else. The Gartman Letter is not cheap... but if you’re a trader controlling a large stake, you can’t afford not to read it. For a trial, contact chip@thegartmanletter.com

Investing Under the Democrats… Who Wins/Who Loses
by Dennis Gartman

November 11, 2006

After this week’s election, there are a few things I am certain of…

The profits of American oil companies and Big Pharma companies may be in jeopardy. And the big winner in this election will be investments in the Canadian oil sands. Trade accordingly.

Let’s take a look at which investment sectors will be the likely winners and losers, and why…

The Winners

Biotechs should be winners, benefiting from stem-cell research, which will now certainly be viewed positively in light of the furor over Michael J. Fox.
Advertisement

Alternative Energy will be a winner. The Democrats almost certainly will increase both the funding of and the incentives for alternative energy. The major winners will be ethanol, wind energy, and bio-fuels companies. We are not supporters of corn-based ethanol, believing it to be a truly inferior product compared to bio-diesel, but the Democrats will not care and the public "loves" the concept of ethanol.

Thus, the truly big winner is, as it should be, is Canadian oil. The Democrats should love Canadian tar sand oil production, for it is the true, viable, and massively available “alternative” fuel.

The Losers

Big Pharmaceuticals... If Canadian oil sands are the big winner, “Big Pharma” is the big loser, by a wide margin. The Democrats intend to attack and perhaps try to overhaul the current prescription drug plan enacted by Republicans a couple of years ago. No matter how we view the recent electoral developments, we cannot cast the results as anything other than materially deleterious to these companies.

Defense... Although defense spending as a percentage of GDP remains far too low, not too high, in our opinion, defense spending will be the Democrat’s sights.

Big Oil.... Big Oil is always the Left’s favorite “bad boy.” When all else fails, attack Big Oil. Under John Dingell, U.S. oil companies will be under attack.

Rep. John Dingell (Mich.-D) will almost certainly be named as chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. He is quite far left-of-center and prone to uncomfortably antibusiness rhetoric. For example, when queried yesterday as to the possible areas of his committee's interest in the future, he said:

“We certainly are going to find out whether or not the American consumer is being screwed by Big Oil.” One can surmise that the only answer that Mr. Dingell's committee will be comfortable with is “Well, of course they are, and let's get those nasty oil companies and make ‘em pay!”

The First Thing I Read Every Day

What I've Learned In 30 Years

I Was Wrong

Also, Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.),the presumptive House speaker, already has said that many tax breaks and financial incentives given to the largest energy companies will be under direct review and all haste shall be made to end them.... immediately. The public will love this, even as they own oil company shares... illogical though that might be.

In sum, it appears that Canadian oil will be the clear winner, for the profits from Canadian oil companies are beyond the purview of the left-of-center U.S. Congress under the Democrats, at the expense of American oil. Invest accordingly.

Dennis Gartman,
for DailyWealth

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

40%

Increase in value of December 2006 corn in the past two months

On Tour In America’s Heartland
by Tom Dyson

November 6, 2006

I’ve been expecting a jump in agriculture prices for a while now, for several reasons. One, they’ve been overlooked by investors, so the prices haven’t gone anywhere in years.

Read On…

A $20 Million Pile of Gold…
In Iowa

by Tom Dyson
November 7, 2006

The American ethanol industry is going to consume more corn than ever before over the next few years. Now I’ve seen how much corn these plants are chewing up, I’m even more bullish on corn.

Read On…

Sandinistas Retake Nicaragua
by Steve Sjuggerud
November 8, 2006

I wish I could tell you “everything will be fine,” or even that it won’t be fine. At least we’d have some sort of answer. But I can’t tell you either… because I don’t know. Nobody does. Markets hate uncertainty, and it looks like we’ll have uncertainty for a while with Ortega in power in Nicaragua.

Read On…

Dinner With An Iowa Commodities Broker
by Tom Dyson

November 9, 2006

Why is Gary so bullish on corn? There simply isn’t enough, he says, and the market doesn’t know it yet. Dozens of new ethanol plants are soaking up all the corn and now there isn’t enough to feed the animals. Plus, the human population is growing and the crop acreage is shrinking.

Read On…

Word on the Street in Nicaragua
by Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
November 10, 2006

Nicaragua’s coastline is beautiful. And property there costs a tiny fraction of the price of similar property in California or even neighboring Costa Rica.

If Tommy and Mike are right, folks bold enough to invest there now should do extremely well. I’ll keep sharing what I learn with you, as I learn it.

TONS OF HOMES FOR SALE:
GOOD FOR HOMEBUILDERS

Most people think a glut of new home supply is bad for homebuilding stocks…

After all, a rise in new home supply reflects a lack of demand for the construction of new homes, and lack of demand damages homebuilders’ earnings.

However, as this week’s chart shows, the stock prices of homebuilders do the opposite of what you would expect. In fact, homebuilders do very well during the years following a glut of new home supply (note the rallies after the yellow lines).

-Ian Davis

 

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202