DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login

Oil: Where it Goes After the
Israeli Bombings

by Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
July 17, 2006

"Nothing is more troubling to financial markets than uncertainty… And nothing creates more uncertainty than war, the most unpredictable of all human activities."
-John Steele Gordon, The Great Game

On September 12, 2001, I issued a special report to my subscribers called, What Happens to Stock Markets When National Security is Threatened.

I studied every threat to national security in the 20th Century, and what happened to the stock market afterward. I did the research through the night on September 11th. I felt my subscribers needed to know what could happen… whether the news was good or bad. The conclusion of my report was optimistic:

Ultimately, buying after the period of mass uncertainty, and around the time that some resolution of the uncertainty appears imminent, has traditionally been an excellent way to make money in stocks.”

September 11th changed everything in America. The day before, we were blissfully ignorant. Now we’re aware that there are thousands of men out there, willing to kill us without remorse, simply because we don’t believe in their god.

At the end of my September 12th report, I also included a special section on what happens to commodity prices in times of war. What I found is particularly applicable right now, with what’s going on in Israel today…

In my look at commodity prices, I started with oil. I said, “History suggests that oil prices only rise if the opponent poses a threat to the world supply of oil.”

I gave a few examples of international crises where oil was not at stake in the conflict:

During the Korean War, oil prices fell in inflation adjusted terms. During the year of the Cuban Missile Crisis, oil prices fell adjusted for inflation. And as we steadily became more involved in Vietnam, oil prices fell from 1965-1972 adjusted for inflation. In these situations, the oil supply was not at risk. So if the world supply of oil is not at risk, the price of oil is not at risk.

However, if the world oil supply is perceived to be at risk, oil prices will rise. During the Iran/Iraq conflicts of 1978-1980, oil prices more than doubled from $14 a barrel in 1978 to $35 in 1980. Also, oil prices spiked significantly higher when Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990. But prices then quickly subsided to two-decade lows in 1994.”

The conclusion was simple: “Based on limited evidence, it seems clear that oil prices rise when the supply of oil is threatened in particular, not our national security.”

I believe that conclusion today. But how do we size it up now? If Israel and Hezbollah keep the fighting amongst themselves, there shouldn’t be a long term impact on the price of oil. To be brutally honest, this doesn’t affect the world supply of oil.

The question is: How far will things escalate? I’m no expert in that. Honestly, the possibilities scare me. If oil keeps going up, chances are, it’s telling us we’ve got a lot more to worry about than expensive gas at the pump. Just as the stock market is typically a good leading indicator of the economy… oil is likely a good leading indicator of tension in oil-producing nations.

Starting today, you can think of the price of oil like the president’s approval rating… as the price falls, the world is “voting” that the tensions in the Middle East are easing. And if the price of oil rises, unfortunately, chances are, there’s more trouble to come.

If you want the honest answer on how things are going day-to-day on the Israeli border, don’t watch the news. Watch which way the price of oil moved that day. That will tell you all you need to know.

Good investing,

Steve

Editor's note: Steve Sjuggerud is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Steve Sjuggerud.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

NEW HIGHS OF NOTE LAST WEEK

Merck & Co. (MRK)… Big Pharma
BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (BPT)… energy
Goodrich Petroleum (GDP)… energy
Frontier Oil (FTO)… oil refiner
Seabridge Gold (SA)… gold hoarder
Equity Office Properties (EOP)… office REIT
Crude Oil, Corn, Unleaded Gasoline, Soybean Oil

NEW LOWS OF NOTE LAST WEEK

Dow Chemical (DOW)… chemicals
Bandag (BDG)… tires
Nearly every publicly traded homebuilder
Retail HOLDRs (RTH)… retail stock ETF
Internet HOLDRs (HHH)… Internet stock ETF
Brunswick (BS)… world’s largest recreational boat maker
Home Depot (HD)… home improvement
Lowe’s (LOW)… home improvement
Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY)… home furnishing
IBM (IBM)… big blues
Dell (DELL)… computers
First Israel Fund (ISL)… Israeli stocks

New Low of Special Note: After a brief rebound in June, the homebuilding sector resumed a brutal downtrend last week. Even best builders are down 50% from their 2005 highs. This 2-year chart of the Philly Homebuilding Index displays the plunge:

-Brian Hunt


“Europe's dilemma reflects how dramatically the balance of power between the world's energy importing and exporting countries has changed as oil and gas prices have soared in the past few years, turning Russia from a supplicant for foreign aid to a cash-rich power courted for its energy resources.

Europe has grown increasingly dependent on gas to generate its electricity, and its share of global gas consumption is soaring. It already gets a quarter of its gas from Russia, a level that is expected to rise to a third by 2015.

That means that, like the U.S.'s concerns about Middle Eastern oil, Russian gas is the continent's top energy security worry. Not only is there a risk that Russia might use its control of Europe's gas as a political tool, but the International Energy Agency says Russia may not even have enough gas to fulfill its promises to supply Europe.

Alexei Miller, chief executive of Russia gas monopoly OAO Gazprom, proudly told shareholders last month. ‘The natural-gas market is now a seller's market.’”

-The Wall Street Journal

“For the Kremlin, Gazprom is much more than a moneymaker.

Assets such as Gazprom have become tools of influence. Gazprom owns Russia's highest-rated television network, NTV, and last year bought a leading newspaper, Izvestia. It also is the majority shareholder in Russia's leading radio station, Ekho Moskvy, and reportedly has expressed an interest in acquiring Komsomolskaya Pravda, one of the country's largest dailies.”

-Chicago Tribune

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202