DailyWealth Investment Newsletter  

About DailyWealth Premium Content DailyWealth Archive
DailyWealth Investment Newsletter DailyWealth Contributors DailyWealth Resources DailyWealth Market Window
 
DailyWealth Print Edition Print Edition | Sponsored Link:
True Wealth Login
The End Of The New York Stock Exchange As We Know It
by Dr. Steve Sjuggerud

January 3, 2006

As of Friday, an era ended on Wall Street. The market for “seats” on the New York Stock Exchange ceased to exist.

It’s not a joke. The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is making a major change...

For the first time in its 213-year history, the NYSE will become a for-profit company. Seats (which are not really seats, but are more like memberships giving brokerage firms the ability to trade directly on The Floor) are now officially gone. Today the new system will get started… and ultimately seats will end up converting into cash and shares in a new stock: NYSE Group, Inc.

To mark the end of the NYSE as a private organization, I thought I’d look back and see if we could learn anything from the cost of a seat throughout the history of the Exchange.

We can. The lesson is simple…

There’s a myth that people on Wall Street know what they’re doing. Boy, they really don’t.

You’d think they’d have some inside knowledge and be able to trade. But the price of a seat on the exchange over history is excellent proof they can’t trade at all…

As stocks soared just before the crash of 1929, seat prices on the NYSE reached their all-time highest levels (adjusted for inflation), as you can see in the chart here. In 1929, the Wall Street pros could only see prosperity, and a never-ending demand for stocks from the public. Back then, the big Wall Street firms bid up prices to a high of over $6 million (in today’s dollars).

The lowest low was reached in 1977, when one seat was actually sold for $35,000. Two years later, BusinessWeek ran its now-famous cover story “The Death of Equities.” The magazine predicted alternative investments like gold and commodities would take over stocks for good.

BusinessWeek got it exactly wrong. Alternative investments peaked when that issue came out, and slid for the next 20+ years. Meanwhile, stocks were just about to embark on their greatest rise in history.

Judging by the price of a seat on the NYSE, the Wall Street pros got it exactly wrong too. At the top of the stock market (in 1929, the late 1960s, and 2000), the price for a seat on the NYSE peaked as well. The big brokers on Wall Street believed the hype.

Looking back over history, stock prices hit major bottoms at almost the exact same time the price of a seat hit record lows. It’s uncanny how the price of a seat was such a good long-run indicator of whether or not stocks in general were cheap or expensive.

There are two things to take away from today’s letter…

First, of course, is that Wall Street “experts” are not good buyers and sellers of assets. On the contrary, Wall Street pros are as gullible as anyone, maybe even more so.

And second, judging by current prices in 2006, we’re definitely closer to a high in the stock market than a low…

As of today, the value of a seat on the stock market is near record levels. It’s (very roughly) $4 million… not far from the 1929 record (adjusted for inflation), and well above the 1968 high (adjusted for inflation).

Later this year, we’ll probably hear a lot of hype about shares of NYSE stock. I’m not at all interested. Instead, I’ll use the shares as an indicator, just like the seat prices over the last 100 years.

If the last time around is any guide, when seat prices peaked in 1968 and bottomed in 1977, the time to absolutely load up on stocks might be 9-10 years from today...

Good investing,

Steve

Editor's note: Steve Sjuggerud is a regular contributor to DailyWealth, a free investment newsletter focused on the world's best contrarian opportunities. We write with a simple belief in mind: You don't have to take big risks to make big money with your investments.

Sign up today to read more investment ideas from Steve Sjuggerud.

Email a Friend

Delicious
Reddit

Digg

RSS

HOW TO FIND THE BIGGEST WINNERS OF 2006

Looking back at the biggest stock market winners of the past year, a familiar theme keeps cropping up: The most profitable, highest-returning stocks are almost always microcap stocks, or stocks under $250 million in market cap.

The reason behind the profitability of tiny stocks is simple: It’s much easier for a $50 million company to grow rapidly and produce large share price gains than it is for a $5 billion company.

Here’s a look at two small stocks that soared in 2005: Hansen Natural (HANS) and Birch Mountain Development (BMD).

Beverage maker Hansen Natural, up 332%:

Industrial mineral producer Birch Mountain Resources, up 250%:

At any given time, there are a handful of microcap stocks like these shooting up the charts. Our colleague Graham Summers spends his days finding these stocks for his advisory service Microcap Moonshots.

Recently, Graham rode microcap car security firm LoJack (LOJN) to a 54% gain in six months.

 


“If you are in the Nasdaq—if you are in technology stocks, I would not be selling here. Now it is almost too late.”

- Suze Orman, author of
You’ve Earned It, Don’t Lose It,
on Larry King Live, January 2, 2001

The Nasdaq lost 40% over the next two years

“You can’t afford not to listen to this woman.”

- Larry King, on Suze Orman


“Ads mentioning real estate tycoon Donald Trump and those hawking "Penis Patch" body enhancements were among the top 10 junk e-mails in 2005, according to America Online.

In 2005, AOL blocked an average of 1.5 billion spams per day. Approximately 8 in 10 e-mails received at its gateway were blocked as junk.”

- Reuters


“Nationwide, a family earning the median income - the exact middle of all incomes - would have to spend 22 percent of its pretax pay this year on mortgage payments to buy the median-priced house, according to an analysis by Moody's Economy.com, a research company.

The share has increased since 1998, when it hit a low of 17 percent before house prices began rising sharply in many places. Although the overall level has reached its highest point since 1989, it remains well below the levels of the early 1980's, when it topped 30 percent.”

- The New York Times

“Mr. [Bill] Miller's Legg Mason Value Trust Fund officially outperformed the Standard & Poor's 500-stock index for the 15th year in a row at the end of trading Friday, but just barely. It scraped past by only 0.59 percentage point with a return of 6.02% for the year, according to preliminary data from Lipper Inc.”
- The Wall Street Journal

10 Years of Predictions

In his latest shareholder letter to investors, Robert Olstein of the Olstein Financial AlertFund (OFALX) writes of the many market predictions given by his fund over the past 10 years: the hazards of mindless index investing… the losses that overvalued internet stocks could deliver…

Over the last 10 years, through their predictions and investment strategy, the Olstein Financial Alert Fund has achieved an average annualized return of 15.9%

What is Olstein’s latest prediction?

The waves of greed and fear will continue to give the Olstein Financial Alert Fund an opportunity to buy cheap stocks and outperform the market.

As shown on his list of top holdings, Olstein is “predicting” these five stocks will do well in the next few years:

- Tyco International (TYC)
- Interpublic Group (IPG)
- Del Monte Foods (DLM)
- Quanta Services (PWR)
- Williams Companies (WMB)

Hot New Stock Offerings - Are They Worth It?
December 30, 2005

A Stunning and Painful Collapse
December 29, 2005

How To Achieve Anything In 2006
December 28, 2005

The Most Prescient Insider I've Ever Seen
December 27, 2005

Welcome to the Jungle
December 23, 2005

Home | About DailyWealth | Premium Content | DailyWealth Archive | Contributors
DailyWealth Resources | Research Reports | Privacy Policy

Customer Service: 1-888-261-2693 – Copyright 2008 Stansberry & Associates Investment Research. All Rights Reserved. Protected by copyright laws of the United States and international treaties. This e-letter may only be used pursuant to the subscription agreement and any reproduction, copying, or redistribution (electronic or otherwise, including on the world wide web), in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited without the express written permission of Stansberry & Associates Investment Research, LLC. 1217 Saint Paul Street, Baltimore MD 21202