Customer Service 1 (888) 261-2693
Please enter Search keyword. Advanced Search

What to Look for Before Putting Money Into Another Gold Stock

By Matt Badiali, editor, S&A Resource Report
Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Gold-stock investors are bitterly disappointed.  
 
It makes little sense that an entire industry – or even an individual company – could perform worse than the stuff it makes for any significant period of time. After all, if your labor isn't adding any value, something's wrong...
 
But like I showed you last week, that's exactly what's happened to gold stocks. Since 2002, the gold price has risen 446%, while the benchmark index of gold-mining stocks – the NYSE Arca Gold BUGS Index (NYSEARCA: HUI) – is up just 344%. And gold bullion has outperformed mining companies by a ratio of 5-to-1 since January 2010.
 
A lot of gold-stock investors have made much less money than they hoped to. But if you understand why... there's no reason you shouldn't make plenty of money in this sector over the coming years.
 
As I showed you in my previous essay, most miners sacrificed profits for growth. One of the worst offenders was Canadian gold miner Agnico-Eagle. But it was far from the only one.  
 
Today, I'll show you what the other big gold miners got themselves into... and what I'm looking for before I put my money into another gold stock... 
 
Mining companies can grow their reserves in one of two ways. They can go out in the field and find a big new deposit. Or they can go buy someone else's. It's obviously a lot easier and faster to go out and buy what you want.
 
At a conference my publisher Stansberry & Associates held last month in Sea Island, Georgia... Morgan Poliquin – CEO of the small exploration company Almaden Minerals – laid out a series of statistics showing just how badly major gold miners managed their businesses.
 
Morgan is not only a successful junior mining executive, he's also a PhD mining engineer. And his key point was that in a mad dash, these companies loaded their balance sheets with assets... no matter how profitable those assets might be one day... 
 
Reserves in the ground is a figure the market uses to value these companies. The more reserves you have, the higher the market price. As you can see in the table below, companies employed huge capital budgets from 2005 to 2011 to grow reserves...  
 
Company 
Capital Spent 
Reserve Growth 
Cost Per 
Reserve Oz. 
Barrick Gold 
$16 bil. 
51 mil. ounces 
$313 
Goldcorp 
$7.3 bil. 
50 mil. ounces 
$147 
Newmont
$12 bil. 
5 mil. ounces 
$2,230 
Yamana Gold 
$3 bil. 
12 mil. ounces 
$250 
Kinross Gold 
$4.4 bil. 
38 mil. ounces 
$118 
Eldorado Gold 
$1 bil. 
12 mil. ounces 
$84 
Agnico-Eagle 
$3.3 bil. 
8 mil. ounces 
$401 
Iamgold 
$1.5 bil. 
9 mil. ounces 
$175 

Remember... from 2005 to today, the price of gold averaged about $1,000 per ounce. So these companies were willing to spend colossal sums for new reserves.
 
But if we look at how those dollars translated into gold production... the money wasn't well-spent...
 
Company 
Capital Spent 
Production Increase
(per year) 
Cost of New Production
(dollars per oz.) 
Barrick Gold 
$16 bil. 
2.2 mil. ounces 
$7,260 
Goldcorp 
$7.3 bil. 
1.4 mil. ounces 
$5,325 
Newmont
$12 bil. 
-1.2 mil. ounces 
n/a 
Yamana Gold 
$3 bil. 
1.1 mil. ounces 
$2,679 
Kinross Gold 
$4.4 bil. 
1.0 mil. ounces 
$4,457 
Eldorado Gold 
$1 bil. 
0.6 mil. ounces 
$1,733 
Agnico-Eagle 
$3.3 bil. 
0.7 mil. ounces 
$4,486 
Iamgold 
$1.5 bil. 
0.5 mil. ounces 
$2,936 
 
It gets worse: A lot of investors are skeptical that the gold price could rise much further from its high of more than $1,900 an ounce... and that made all that reserve growth the gold companies were buying a lot less appealing to investors.
 
As the price of gold has ebbed over the past year... the giant, low-grade projects that cost billions of dollars to build were no longer economic to develop.
 
The mining firms have begun writing down the asset values. In addition to Agnico-Eagle's $604 million write-down of Meadowbank in the Nunavut region in far northeastern Canada... we've seen Kinross Gold write off $2.7 billion on its Tasiast project in the African nation of Mauritania... and Newmont Mining write off $1.6 billion on its Hope Bay project, also in Nunavut.
 
Today, though, things could be turning around... Many gold miners are making high-profile management changes. Over the summer, Norton Gold Fields, Kinross, and Barrick Gold all changed CEOs.  
 
I'm looking for companies that will focus on disciplined capital allocation – companies that will only spend a dollar when it can expect a reasonable rate of return.  
 
That's something the industry as a whole hasn't done in a long time. And that's why this decade has been so disappointing for gold-stock investors.  
 
But once we bring a "business mentality" back to gold mining, gold-stock investors should see the returns they deserve.  
 
Good investing, 
 
Matt Badiali




Further Reading:

Last week, Matt told DailyWealth readers about the dangers of gold miners sacrificing profits for growth. "The companies' primary focus wasn't running profitable mines... but tapping as much of that investment capital as possible," he writes. "Whether a mining project could ever turn a profit mattered less than simply jacking up reserve numbers." Find out what that meant for shareholders – and get the full story – here.

Market Notes


ATTENTION COMMODITY TRADERS

For the past two years, copper has traded in a consolidating-triangle pattern – bouncing back and forth between its rising support line and its falling resistance line. As you can see in the chart, buying copper at support would have been profitable. So would selling it at resistance...
 
Eventually, copper will break out of this pattern, one way or the other. And the direction of that break will influence the direction of the overall stock market, since copper and stocks historically tend to move together. There's still plenty of room for copper to bounce around inside the triangle for another few months.
 
But as the chart shows, copper is approaching its support line. Since buying it at support would have been profitable several times over the past two years, I suspect it will be profitable this time as well...
 
– Jeff Clark
 

premium teaser


In The Daily Crux



Recent Articles


  • Are You Contrarian Enough for This Trade?
    By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
    Tuesday, February 20, 2018

    Eleven billion dollars... That's how much money two major funds lost in combined market value over the last few weeks.

  • Porter's Latest Prediction Just Came True
    By Justin Brill
    Saturday, February 17, 2018

    Last summer, Stansberry Research founder Porter Stansberry warned that a significant stock market correction was now certain for the first time in years. Surely, Porter is even more bearish now? Not exactly...

  • The One Secret to Thriving in 2018
    By Chris Mayer
    Friday, February 16, 2018

    We all have the same questions: What awaits us this year? What dangers lie ahead? What opportunities? What should we do next?

  • Why Inflation REALLY Matters to Investors
    By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud
    Thursday, February 15, 2018

    Was it a coincidence that inflation soared at the same time the stock market crashed? To find out, let's look a little further back in history...

  • Why the Crypto Correction Is a Good Thing
    By Tama Churchouse
    Wednesday, February 14, 2018

    In the world of crypto assets, a fire is raging right now...