|
| Home | About Us | Resources | Archive | Free Reports | Market Window |
Consumers need to keep their guard up as financial institutions increasingly impose new fees and charges.
Banks and credit-card companies have gone on the offensive in advance of new consumer protections the Obama administration is asking Congress to enact. For many consumers, that could mean an unexpected financial sting.
"The fee income is becoming increasingly more important as interest income is falling as a percentage of total revenues," says Bob Hammer, chief executive of bank-card advisory firm R.K. Hammer.
Late fees, loan-origination fees, over-the-limit and overdraft charges helped generate 53% of banking-industry income in 2008, according to R.K. Hammer, up from 35% of income in 1995. The average bounced-check fee is $28.95, up about $1 from last year, says Greg McBride, senior analyst at Bankrate.com. And it's a charge that rises every year.
Banks and credit-card companies have gone on the offensive in advance of new consumer protections the Obama administration is asking Congress to enact. For many consumers, that could mean an unexpected financial sting.
"The fee income is becoming increasingly more important as interest income is falling as a percentage of total revenues," says Bob Hammer, chief executive of bank-card advisory firm R.K. Hammer.
Late fees, loan-origination fees, over-the-limit and overdraft charges helped generate 53% of banking-industry income in 2008, according to R.K. Hammer, up from 35% of income in 1995. The average bounced-check fee is $28.95, up about $1 from last year, says Greg McBride, senior analyst at Bankrate.com. And it's a charge that rises every year.
- Wall Street Journal
Rates for 30-year home loans inched downward this week, but still remain above record lows posted during the spring, Freddie Mac said Thursday.
The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 5.32 this week, below last week's average of 5.42 percent. Last year at this time, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 6.35 percent, Freddie Mac said.
Rates on 30-year mortgages fell to a record low of 4.78 percent earlier this year. But then they rose as high as 5.6 percent in June after yields on long-term government debt, which are closely tied to mortgages rates, climbed as investors worried that the huge surplus of government debt hitting the market could trigger inflation.
The average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 5.32 this week, below last week's average of 5.42 percent. Last year at this time, the average rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage was 6.35 percent, Freddie Mac said.
Rates on 30-year mortgages fell to a record low of 4.78 percent earlier this year. But then they rose as high as 5.6 percent in June after yields on long-term government debt, which are closely tied to mortgages rates, climbed as investors worried that the huge surplus of government debt hitting the market could trigger inflation.
- Newsmax
-
I Received an Urgent E-mail Alert from My Lumber Contact
By Tom Dyson Monday, July 6, 2009 I Received an Urgent E-mail Alert from My Lumber Contact -
A Short Guide to Making the World's Best Water Investments
By Chris Mayer Saturday, July 4, 2009 A Short Guide to Making the World's Best Water Investments -
Your Dream Retirement Just Got 50% Cheaper
By David Eifrig Thursday, July 2, 2009 Your Dream Retirement Just Got 50% Cheaper -
The Best Book I've Read This Year
By Tom Dyson Wednesday, July 1, 2009 The Best Book I've Read This Year -
This Sector Is About to Explode
By Dr. Steve Sjuggerud Tuesday, June 30, 2009 This Sector Is About to Explode
If You Live in California, Here's What You Do...
By Dr. Steve SjuggerudTuesday, July 7, 2009
Would you lend money to someone who is completely broke and in a mountain of debt... and only demand 3.75% interest?
That's what California is forcing many people to do today.
California is out of money. But it still must pay people. So it's paying in "IOUs" instead of cash. By the end of this month, California will have handed out over $3 billion in IOUs. These IOUs are only supposed to last for a few months. And they pay a 3.75% annual interest rate.
How will this end?
Some investors are getting excited – they earn interest AND can potentially buy these IOUs at a discount to face value in exchange for cash.
Me? I have no interest in these things. I've seen this exact game before... It happened in Argentina in 2001. The lesson was this: You don't want to lend money for a tiny bit of interest to a broke state that has no problem changing its laws on you.
In 2001, the province of Buenos Aires ran out of money. So it started issuing IOUs called "patacones" that paid 7% interest.
What's a patacon? It looked like money, but it matured a year in the future. The man on the street was confused... Many merchants flat-out refused to accept patacones (though McDonald's offered a special "Pata-Combo").
"One peso buys a cup of coffee or a newspaper... but what will you be able to buy with one Patacon?" an Argentine woman asked the Wall Street Journalin 2001. She had no idea how prophetic her words were...
Long story short, a U.S. dollar's worth of patacones held in late 2001 were worth about 30 U.S. cents a year later at maturity, after the Argentine peso crashed. And that's much better than money issued by other Argentine states... For example, the "federal" issued by the province of Entre Rios north of Buenos Aires was worth maybe 10 cents on the U.S. dollar a year later.
Now, I don't expect a repeat of Argentina's crisis in the States. I don't expect the California IOUs to fall to 30 cents on the dollar.
At the same time, I'm not interested in giving cash today for a patacon, er, a California IOU that promises to pay me back at some future date with only a small amount of promised interest for my troubles.
The government of California is broke. If you're unfortunate enough to receive California "patacones" try to get rid of them. Use them to pay your taxes, sell them to the knuckleheads on Craigslist... do whatever you can.
But don't hold them. The historical record of broke governments issuing IOUs doesn't offer much promise. The "reward" of 3.75% interest versus the risk simply isn't worth it.
Get rid of your California "patacones" if you get 'em...
Good investing,
Steve
P.S. These IOUs are different than municipal bonds. Some California municipal bonds actually could do just fine – particularly "revenue" bonds, which pay you back directly from the project the bonds financed, like a toll road.
That's what California is forcing many people to do today.
California is out of money. But it still must pay people. So it's paying in "IOUs" instead of cash. By the end of this month, California will have handed out over $3 billion in IOUs. These IOUs are only supposed to last for a few months. And they pay a 3.75% annual interest rate.
How will this end?
Some investors are getting excited – they earn interest AND can potentially buy these IOUs at a discount to face value in exchange for cash.
Me? I have no interest in these things. I've seen this exact game before... It happened in Argentina in 2001. The lesson was this: You don't want to lend money for a tiny bit of interest to a broke state that has no problem changing its laws on you.
In 2001, the province of Buenos Aires ran out of money. So it started issuing IOUs called "patacones" that paid 7% interest.
What's a patacon? It looked like money, but it matured a year in the future. The man on the street was confused... Many merchants flat-out refused to accept patacones (though McDonald's offered a special "Pata-Combo").
"One peso buys a cup of coffee or a newspaper... but what will you be able to buy with one Patacon?" an Argentine woman asked the Wall Street Journalin 2001. She had no idea how prophetic her words were...
Long story short, a U.S. dollar's worth of patacones held in late 2001 were worth about 30 U.S. cents a year later at maturity, after the Argentine peso crashed. And that's much better than money issued by other Argentine states... For example, the "federal" issued by the province of Entre Rios north of Buenos Aires was worth maybe 10 cents on the U.S. dollar a year later.
Now, I don't expect a repeat of Argentina's crisis in the States. I don't expect the California IOUs to fall to 30 cents on the dollar.
At the same time, I'm not interested in giving cash today for a patacon, er, a California IOU that promises to pay me back at some future date with only a small amount of promised interest for my troubles.
The government of California is broke. If you're unfortunate enough to receive California "patacones" try to get rid of them. Use them to pay your taxes, sell them to the knuckleheads on Craigslist... do whatever you can.
But don't hold them. The historical record of broke governments issuing IOUs doesn't offer much promise. The "reward" of 3.75% interest versus the risk simply isn't worth it.
Get rid of your California "patacones" if you get 'em...
Good investing,
Steve
P.S. These IOUs are different than municipal bonds. Some California municipal bonds actually could do just fine – particularly "revenue" bonds, which pay you back directly from the project the bonds financed, like a toll road.
STOCKS ARE NEAR AN IMPORTANT "LINE IN THE SAND"
It's time to check in on one of the "must watch" charts for the trader: The all-important S&P 500.
Most folks like to look at the Dow Industrials and say the market is "down 10 points" or is "up big today." But seasoned investors watch the S&P 500 index. It's a wider gauge of the market. And as you can see from today's chart, this gauge is near a short-term "line in the sand."
From early March to mid-June, the S&P enjoyed a historic 42% bounce. This bounce took the S&P to a high of 946. But since that high, stocks have displayed "soggy" behavior. The market has given back a portion of that 42% gain... and is camped near an important chart level: the May low of 882.
The 882 area is where the last set of heavy "trench warfare" occurred between buyers and sellers. If sellers are able to push the S&P below this recent support level, more losses for stocks are likely to follow.
Most folks like to look at the Dow Industrials and say the market is "down 10 points" or is "up big today." But seasoned investors watch the S&P 500 index. It's a wider gauge of the market. And as you can see from today's chart, this gauge is near a short-term "line in the sand."
From early March to mid-June, the S&P enjoyed a historic 42% bounce. This bounce took the S&P to a high of 946. But since that high, stocks have displayed "soggy" behavior. The market has given back a portion of that 42% gain... and is camped near an important chart level: the May low of 882.
The 882 area is where the last set of heavy "trench warfare" occurred between buyers and sellers. If sellers are able to push the S&P below this recent support level, more losses for stocks are likely to follow.