| Home | About Us | Resources | Archive | Free Reports | Market Window |
Another Collapse in Technology StocksBy Tom Dyson, publisher, The Palm Beach LetterMonday, September 11, 2006 What a party we had in August. August is a quiet time in the market. Volumes are light and news is thin. Earnings reports are put on hold for September and October and most traders and analysts go on vacation. As a young bond accountant in London, I remember this time of year fondly... it was the only time of year I could get a seat on the subway! There’s another aspect to August trading. It’s easier to push the market around. It reminds me of the golden age when big traders like Vanderbilt or Daniel Drew owned the markets. The market was shallow back then so they could play all sorts of games, like creating squeezes and starting bear campaigns. It was almost as if they were playing chess against each other. ---------- Advertisement --------- ---------------------------------- I mention this because today I received my September issue of The High Tech Strategist. Fred Hickey, the author, thinks the market was “goosed higher” in August 2006.
Here are some examples, from Hickey’s research:
“Other than analyst upgrades,” says Hickey, “there’s no significant news to account for this activity. [These stocks] all have one thing in common, however. They are all high-beta trading favorites of the wise guys. “Throughout this month, I’ve had the strange feeling we’ve seen this all before,” he continues. “Turns out, we have...” Hickey sees a market that is “eerily similar” to the market leading into September 2000. If you recall, there was a big tech party in August 2000, with semiconductor stocks like Intel making new all-time highs, bouncing back after the bust in March 2000. Then in September, tech stocks got wiped out. The Nasdaq dropped 17% in September 2000 and many of the fad stocks were cut in half. Hickey sees the same thing happening again in September 2006. He’s very bearish on technology stocks right now, and given the nature of August’s rally, he thinks we have an excellent opportunity to bet on a big decline in technology stocks. At this point, I could detail Hickey’s research to make his point. He studies component distribution, inventory build-ups, Taiwanese PC motherboard reports, and the latest shipment levels from Cisco. It’s all noted in his newsletter. But I’ll save you the time. Let me state it like this: No one knows the technology sector like Hickey. He knows it inside out. He listens to all the conference calls, reads the trade magazines, and studies all the earnings reports. Oh yeah... he’s also been investing in and writing exclusively about technology stocks for the past three decades. This is all you need to know: “Over the past several days and weeks,” says Hickey, “I have built up my largest put option position probably since September 2000.” Hickey is an astute investor. I know this for a fact because I always follow the performance of his recommendations after he makes them. Today, we simply pass his message onto you. What you do with it is your own business. Personally, I don’t trade options. So I’m happy to watch the spectacle from the sidelines and wait for a buying opportunity.
P.S. Fred doesn’t do any marketing for The High Tech Strategist, and he doesn’t have a website. I guess word of mouth recommendations give him plenty of business. If you’re interested in subscribing, he provides this information at the bottom of the letter: One year subscription: $120 (US) (including Canada). International: $150 (US). Check or money order to The High Tech Strategist, payable to a U.S. bank. Three month trial: $50 (US). Fax delivery available for an additional charge of $30 to the U.S., $75 to international numbers. To subscribe, please send your name, address and check or money order to: The High-Tech Strategist, PO Box 3133, Nashua, NH 03061-3133.
NEW HIGHS OF NOTE LAST WEEK Oracle (ORCL)… software
NEW LOWS OF NOTE LAST WEEK Beazer Homes (BZH)… homebuilder -Brian Hunt |
|